CERN QT4HEP, LHC, Atlas, CMS and antimatter factory

Publié le 27 janvier 2025 et mis à jour le 29 janvier 2025 - Commenter -
PDF Afficher une version imprimable de cet article
  

From January 20th to 23rd 2025, I participated in the QT4HEP conference at CERN and had a chance to visit several experiments from CERN. This was quite an experience that I recount here.

This illustrated post contains:

  • A description of QT4HEP’s conference highlights.
  • A primer on high-energy particle physics.
  • An overview or CERN activities.
  • A presentation of the LHC and its technology.
  • A photography report of Atlas, CMS, and the antimatter factory.
  • A small reminder that the web and HTML were created at CERN.

QT4HEP conference

The Quantum Technologies for High-Energy Physics conference was the second one of the kind after the previous edition in 2022. It is organized by the CERN Quantum Technologies Initiative. CERN is also a cofounder of the Open Quantum Institute which deals with the societal impact of quantum technologies.

The QT4HEP conference goals was to showcase how HEP physicists can use quantum technologies in their work and how HEP physics could potentially help develop new quantum technologies. It brought together high-energy particle physicists interested in quantum technologies (computing, sensing, communications), and specialists in the latter fields. I met there with many interesting people from various backgrounds, both from the academic world and from companies like Nu Quantum, Single Quantum, IDQ, Amazon, Pasqal, and others. You can download the talks presentations on the event site.

I was there for delivering a talk providing an overview of the state of the art of quantum computing software and hardware: Quantum computing roadmaps towards fault-tolerance (31 slides presentation and video recording). I was invited there by Benjamin Frisch and Amanda Diez Fernandez from CERN.

The conference was introduced by Enrica Maria Porcari (head of CERN IT) and Sofia Vallecorsa (head of CERN QTI).

It was followed by a first talk by Petra Scudo, a technology expert from the European Commission Joint Research Centre based in Italy, Belgium, Spain, the Netherlands and Germany, an in-house scientific and technical service of the EU that works for more than 30 policy departments. She spent most of her time describing EuroQCI programs in space and terrestrial quantum communications.

I will mention here a couple presentations from the conference. There were many other that I don’t cover here, including those about various quantum algorithms to simulate high-energy physics phenomena and experiments and also, quantum sensors used in high-energy physics. You hear a lot about simulating lattice gauge theory and Schwinger models, being part of quantum fields, quantum electrodynamics and quantum chromodynamics domains. In my own presentation, I highlighted the fact that these quantum dynamics simulations are easier to implement, even in NISQ, than quantum chemistry simulations. It exemplifies the fact that quantum computing may become useful to physicists before it helps industries.

Boris Alexander Korzh from the University of Geneva covered high-speed SNSPD (single nanowire superconducting photon detectors) used for clock-rate scaling in quantum networks. It contained an interesting chart showing the progress in 9 years and expected advances till 2030. Particularly, the increase in maximum count rate will lead to grow the clock-rate in quantum communications to over 10 GHz as well a PNRD (photon number resolution detectors) with 12.5 GHz clock rates, useful in quantum computing.

Felix Bussière, VP R&D from IDQ (Switzerland), also talked about PNR SNSPDs (photo number resolution single nanowire superconducting photon detectors…), mentioning Gaussian boson sampling and Quandela experiments as well as their work with Orca Computing.

Arian Stolk from QuTech, Delft, did two presentations, one on entanglement between QPUs, including one experiment using NV centers based QPUs and the other one, with a broad overview on the quantum Internet.

Simone Eizagirre Barker, product manager at Nu Quantum (UK) presented their QPU’s photonic-based interconnect technology, the UKRI sponsored LYRA project for the creation of a prototype of a data-centre compatible rack-mounted Quantum Networking Unit (QNU), their relation with the White Rabbit sensors interconnect project and some insights on how to distribute logical qubits across multiple QPUs.

Mael Flament, Qunnect’s CTO (Brooklyn, NYC, USA) described his room temperature quantum memory that can be used to create long distance entanglement sharing quantum networks.

Mateus Sena from Deutsche Telekom’s T Labs described their various quantum communications projects. They work noticeably with Qunnect and VeriQloud.

Marianne Schoerling presented the Open Quantum Initiative, which is funded by UBS and is willing to avoid the misuse of quantum technology.

Fabio Maltoni from the Universities of Bologna and Louvain presented the kinds of quantum physics observables used in high-energy physics, focusing on the top quark, the heaviest elementary particle from the standard model, neutrons and protons being made of “up” and “down” quarks. It is not found in common matter made of baryons given its lifetime observed at the LHC is of only 10⁻²⁵ second. I liked the laundry list of fundamental questions asked by Fabio Maltoni in his presentation (below). He also dealt with Bell entanglement tests done with the LHC using both Atlas and CMS experiments! I discovered the notion of toponium, a composite low-lifespan top/down quark particle, which I won’t detail here.

Francesco de Dominicis from INFN (Italy) presented a superconducting gamma ray detector. That’s quite an uncommon quantum sensor.

Ankul Prajapati from LKB (France) presented advances in circular Rydberg cold atom experiments.

Young Jin Kim from Los Alamos National Laboratory (USA) presented his work on axions detection using optical detection and spin squeezing. This is related to the search of dark matter.

Denis Lacroix from ijcLab (France) presented recent progress in the description of atomic nuclei using quantum computers and quantum phase estimation (QPE). He teams up with various researchers, including Thomas Ayral from Eviden.

HEP primer

High-energy particle physics is about learning the most inner components of matter (elementary fermions) and force carriers (elementary bosons) from the standard model, down to quarks and other elementary particles and fields (map below, from Wikipedia).

Unless you are a high-energy particle physicist, you may not know well all these particles. Neither do I! So, here is a primer on this that you can easily skip to read the remainder of this post:

  • Quarks (purple) come in six “flavors” (up, down, charm, strange, top, bottom). They participate in the strong nuclear interaction, that is mediated by gluons force carriers. It is modeled by quantum chromodynamics (QCD). Quarks also carry fractional electric charges (+2/3 or -1/3 in units of the electron charge) and are always confined within composite particles called hadrons, including protons and neutrons. Neutrons and protons contain only up and down quarks, held together by gluon forces. The heavier charm, strange, bottom, and top quarks do not persist in matter. They rapidly decay into lighter up and down quarks. They appear in short-lived particles produced in high-energy experiments. In that bestiary, hadrons are particles bound by the strong interaction, while baryons is a subclass of hadrons composed of three “valence” quarks which determine their overall quantum numbers (electric charge, baryon number, and strangeness). And on, and on, and on… !
  • Leptons (green) are massive elementary particles which do not feel the strong interaction. They include the electron, muon, and tau, along with their corresponding neutrinos. Charged leptons (electron, muon, tau) can interact electromagnetically, while the related neutrinos engage only through the weak force and gravity. Unlike quarks, leptons appear as free particles in nature and have integer electric charges (electron, muon, tau each with -1, neutrinos being neutral with a 0 charge).
  • Interactions and force carriers (red and yellow) contain the gauge bosons (photons, gluons, Z and W bosons) and the Higgs boson. These are mediating the interactions among quarks and leptons. Photons are massless bosons described quantum electrodynamics (QED). They do not carry electric charge and travel at the speed of light in vacuum. They participate to the exchange of energy with electrons, famously described in quantum physics in the Bohr atomic model. The strong force holds quarks together inside neutrons and protons. It is conveyed by eight types of gluons which are also massless. But gluons experience the interaction they mediate, creating gluon self-interactions. The weak interaction involves the exchange of the charged W bosons (W⁺ and W⁻) and the electrically neutral Z boson, all of which are massive. The weak force acts over extremely short ranges, driving atomic nuclei beta decay (fission) and nuclear fusion. In this framework, the Higgs boson is the “quantum excitation of the Higgs field”, a scalar field that “spontaneously breaks the electroweak symmetry in the Standard Model”. This mechanism explains how particles acquire mass.

Quarks and leptons are fermions massive particles. Quarks and leptons have their antiparticles, not shown in the typical standard model table as above, like antiquarks and antileptons, the most famous being the positron, which is the antiparticle of the electron. It was theoretically discovered by Paul Dirac in 1928. Even non charge particles like neutrinos have their antiparticles with a similar 1/2 spin but with different other quantum properties (opposite-signed lepton number and weak isospin (I skip the details here), and right-handed instead of left-handed chirality).

In quantum physics, fermions and bosons can also relate to composite particles made of elementary particles from the standard model. Depending on their total spin, easily computed with the number of neutrons being odd or even, an atom can be a boson or a fermion, following the famous Einstein-Bose or Fermi-Dirac statistics. In plain words, bosons with the same quantum numbers can stick together while fermions can’t, following Pauli’s exclusion principle.

One key question I have in mind here is “how classical quantum physics is different from high-energy particle physics“? Here is a simple answer…

Quantum physics used in so-called quantum technologies deals with atoms, molecules, electrons and photons, and involves (relatively) low-energy phenomena. It explains the exchange of energy between light and matter, atomic spectra, chemical bonding, and the properties of materials. It is essential in condensed matter physics (superconductors), quantum chemistry, and nanotechnology involving all semiconductors. It mostly use non-relativistic effects although the Dirac relativistic equation helps explain some atomic spectra artefacts. In classical quantum physics, only photons are created and annihilated. The theoretical framework is based on a set of postulates including the representation of states by wavefunctions (Schrodinger’s wave equation), the manipulation of Hilbert spaces, observables by matrix operators in such spaces, and the probabilistic interpretation of measurement outcomes. They are derived with concepts such as superposition and entanglement within a fixed particle number framework.

High-energy physics focuses on the fundamental constituents of matter and their interactions at the highest energies and smallest scales, below neutrons and protons for example. It explores particles like quarks, leptons, bosons, and the forces that govern their interactions. It involves massive particles creation and annihilation. It helps understand the fundamental forces of nature, the Standard Model of particle physics, and the phenomena occurring in particle accelerators and cosmic events. It also explore physics beyond the Standard Model, such as with supersymmetry or string theories. The main theoretical frameworks are the relativistic quantum field theory, quantum chromodynamics, gauge symmetry, renormalization techniques, and spontaneous symmetry breaking giving rise to particle masses creation. Elementary particles also have additional quantum numbers (properties) like isospin (for quarks and particles made of quarks like protons and neutrons), and weak isospin, charm (for so-called left-handed fermions and also some bosons), strangeness (which relates to the number of strange quarks and antiquarks in composite particles), topness (difference between the number of top quarks and top antiquarks in composite particles), bottomness (same for bottom quarks/antiquarks), baryon (1/3 the difference between quarks and antiquarks) and lepton numbers (difference between number of leptons and antileptons).

The second quantization formalism is a bridge between these two domains. It is widely used in non-HEP quantum physics and technologies. It involves the use of creation and annihilation operators, which enable the addition or removal of particles from quantum states. It makes use of number operators counting the number of particles like photons in a given state (aka Fock states). The second quantization is heavily used in condensed matter physics, including the study of complex materials like superconductors and superconducting qubits, quantum phase transitions, and also quantum photonics.

More on this:

CERN quick overview

CERN (Centre Européen de Recherche Nucléaire) is an international research organization created in 1954. It celebrated its 70 years of existence in 2024.

Is is focused on high-energy particle physics. One of CERN’s missions is to search for the origins of the Universe. Its LHC is the greatest physics experiment on Earth, larger in size (but not costs, $7.5B) than the international ITER nuclear fusion plan under construction in France (>$25B), the US LIGO ($1B) and the EU VIRGO gravitational waves detectors, the SOLEIL electrons synchrotron in France or the giant Five-hundred-meter Aperture Spherical Telescope (FAST) in China. Of course, these installations are used for different purposes, but all are related to physics or astrophysics.

CERN members are UE countries (Germany, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Denmark, Spain, Finland, France, Greece, Hungary, Italy,  the Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia, Czechia, Sweden) and non-EU countries (Israel, Norway, United Kingdom, Switzerland). Its funding was of 1.37B€ in 2023 according to their 2023 report. The funding is proportional to its members GDP. CERN experiments installation are used, mostly remotely, by 12,370 users located in 80 countries, including the USA with its 2,007 users. CERN has 2,600 employees.

CERN uses a peak electrical power of 200 MW when the LHC is operating, mostly due to cooling it with liquid helium. Maintenance is done during winter for a simple reason: that is when the surrounding area, including Geneva, needs the most electricity, for heating. Likewise, in the USA, similar facilities are in maintenance during summer, when electricity is needed for air conditioning.

More on CERN:

LHC

The Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is at the core of CERN’s infrastructure. It is a protons and ions accelerator used by some underground experiments like Atlas and CMS. It is fed by a series of smaller synchrotrons built over several decades (BOOSTER, PS, SPS).

It is currently the world’s largest and highest-energy particle accelerator, driving propulsing protons or ions at an energy level of 7 TeV. These are charged and massive particles. They are accelerated by an electric field and oriented by a magnetic field.

The 27 km tunnel hosting the LHC was actually built between 1985 and 1989 for the LEP, an electron-positron accelerator. It is between 50 and 175 m deep under the ground. The interior of the tunnel was replaced by the LHC infrastructure between 1998 and 2008, on top of the buildout of several large experiments along the way, like Atlas, CMS, ALICE and LHCb. It operated first in 2010 and the Higgs boson existence was discovered in the Atlas and CMS experiments in 2011 and reported in 2012. The LHC was then shut down and upgraded to increase its power (2013-2015) and for maintenance and other upgrades (2018-2022). The LHC is not perfectly circular but made of several straight and curved segments, magnetic fields being used to orient the proton/ions beams.

The two largest “experiments” are Atlas and CMS. They are also underground sitting in giant concrete caves. Both experiment project protons against each other in an opposite way, accelerated to a speed very close light speed (c). CMS is smaller than Atlas but heavier (see table below).

In the LHC, accelerated protons and ions travel inside two parallel, stainless-steel vacuum tubes known as “beam pipes”, with an inside pressure of  10⁻¹⁰ mbar, aka “ultra-high vacuum”. As a comparison, the pressure in cold atom chambers used in neutral atoms quantum computers is slightly lower, at 1.3×10⁻¹¹ mbar, but in a much smaller volume. These internal pipes have an inner diameter of 56 mm and drive the protons/ions in opposite directions. They are surrounded by a superconducting magnet operating at 1.9 K and cooled by a stream of liquid helium. The whole system is in a pipe aka “vacuum vessel” about 90 cm wide. The pipes send their particle beams on a given location in the Atlas, CMS and other experiments, their opposite direction creates a shock at an energy of 14 TeV per proton. It creates particles sent in all directions which are then detected by many sensors capturing their direction, velocity and energy. The proton beams are made of 2,808 bunches, each bunch containing 10¹¹protons (100 billion), but the chance that opposite directions protons collide is very small. Still, the LHC can generate about 600 million particle collisions per second.

The LHC tunnel is about 3.8 m wide.

And the related energies and proton speeds generated in the various accelerators at CERN.

Starting in 2025 or later, the LHC will run through a major upgrade, as part of the High-Luminosity LHC (HL-LHC) project. It will enable extend LHC operations until the early 2040s.

A future circular collider of 90.7 km circumference is being planned. The tunnel would first host the FCC-ee, an electron–positron collider. The FCC-hh would then be installed in the same tunnel, reusing the existing infrastructure, exactly like when the LHC experiment replaced the LEP experiment in the same 27 km tunnel. The FCC-hh will create collision energies of 100 TeV, vs the 14 TeV of the LHC. If funded (> 15B€), this project construction would start in 2030 with the FCC-ee starting operations in the mid 2040s and the FCC-hh starting around 2070. These time scales seem much longer than for the advent of some useful quantum computers!

For more documentation on the LHC:

Atlas

At CERN, you visit the Atlas experiment with getting into a warehouse style building (below). It has some security doors and then a large elevator. After walking through various corridors and sas, you enter the big Atlas cathedral experiment. It is massive, way beyond anything you can discover when visiting a quantum experiment lab or any quantum technology facility.

The proton-proton collisions occurring at the center of the Atlas (and CMS) experiments generate particles that decay in complex ways into even more particles that are themselves detectable.

Atlas contains four kinds of detectors zones:

  • The tracking chambers which measure the trajectories of charged particles such as electrons, muons, and charged hadrons by recording their passage through large silicon pixel sensors, silicon microstrip layers, and a transition radiation tracker. From these precise trajectories, scientists can infer particles momentum by measuring trajectory curvature in the magnetic field.
  • The electromagnetic calorimeter, which is liquid-argon based in Atlas, absorbs and measures the energy of electrons and photons through their electromagnetic showers, enabling accurate reconstruction of their energy and direction.
  • The hadronic calorimeter using scintillating tiles and additional liquid-argon sections stops and measures the energy of strongly interacting particles like pions and protons. These hadrons produce extended hadronic showers that deposit their energy in deeper layers of the calorimeter.
  • The muon chambers are the outermost layers of Atlas that detect muons after they penetrate the inner detector and calorimeters, and are measuring momentum under a dedicated toroidal magnetic field.

The data extracted from all these detectors is combined to identify and reconstruct the different particle types produced in the proton-proton collisions. Undetectable particles like neutrinos are inferred from missing transverse momentum.

Here is the view of the Muon detector (below). It is the only detector you can see when visiting Atlas.

So what is the Higgs boson and how is it detected in Atlas and CMS? To make things short, the Higgs boson is an excitation of the Higgs field, a scalar quantum field responsible for the creation of certain massive elementary particles in the Standard Model of particle physics. It explains how the universe created mass!

In the LHC, the proton-proton collision is generating these Higgs boson which then decay into electrons, muons and photons through two main paths:

H → ZZ(∗) → 4ℓ, ℓ corresponding to an electron or a muon and Z and Z(*) to Z bosons.

H → γγ, two photons.

One very surprising discovery when visiting the Atlas and CMS experiments is that, although we were about 100 m underground, our smartphones were connected to 3G, 4G and 5G depending on the location, thanks to a contract with Swisscom.

When I was visiting Atlas, I measured the ambient magnetic field with my smartphone using the Physics Toolbox application. It detected a field of about 500 µT while outside Atlas, the magnetic field was about 20 to 30 µT. It is not hazardous at all. In hospitals, MRI scanners operate at field strengths of 1.5 T to 3 T!

    

More on this here:

CMS

The CMS visit is a bit more impressive than with Atlas. First, you enter a big hall where the experiment was built. A large shaft was used to convey each large part down below at about 100 m deep. You also take an elevator which is in another shaft, again several corridors, and voilà, you are in CMS.

CMS is built around the following detectors:

  • A silicon pixel and strip tracker. It contains silicon sensors which are quite large compared to the sensors in digital cameras (measured in meters). They measure the trajectories of charged particles by recording their paths as they pass through multiple silicon layers. The tracker then reconstructs particles momentum and charge by observing their curvature in the strong magnetic field inside the CMS detector.
  • An electromagnetic calorimeter (ECAL) made of lead tungstate crystal. It measures the energy and direction of electrons and photons. Interacting with the dense lead tungstate crystal, they create electromagnetic showers, which release energy.
  • A scintillator hadron calorimeter (HCAL) made of brass. It detects and measure the energy of strongly interacting particles, such as pions and protons. These particles create “hadronic showers” when they interact with the brass absorber material. The resulting light from the scintillator layers is collected to measure their energy.
  • Several muon detection chambers in the outermost layers of the CMS experiment. They detect muons paths in the magnetic field. Muons are heavier counterparts of the electron that penetrate through the inner detectors and calorimeters.

The silicon trackers, ECAL and HCAL sit inside a superconducting solenoid of 6 m internal diameter, providing a magnetic field of 3.8 T as shown below.

Below, the various path of detected particles in the layers of detectors:

Below, a 3D view of the CMS layout:

One key difference between Atlas and CMS are their magnetic field. Atlas is using a toroidal magnetic field and CMS is using a solenoid field.

In the visit during the maintenance period, you can see more detectors than with Atlas, pictured below.

Below is what the superconducting magnetic foil is made of, with niobium-titanium wires embedded in an aluminum cast. It reminds me of the coaxial cables used to control superconducting qubits (for the NbTi part).

More on CMS:

Antimatter Factory

I then visited the CERN “antimatter factory” that managed to generate antihydrogen and verify that these atoms were subject to the same gravity as normal matter, in the AEgIS (Antihydrogen Experiment: Gravity, Interferometry, Spectroscopy) experiment in September 2023. It’s big physics!

First, how is antimatter created at CERN? Antiprotons are created using high-energy protons from the Proton Synchrotron (PS) striking a metal target often made of nickel or iridium. These collisions generate secondary particles including antiprotons. A magnetic collection system then selects the negatively charged antiprotons and channels them into the Antiproton Decelerator (AD). The AD slows these antiprotons, after which the ELENA (Extra Low ENergy Antiproton) ring further decelerates them to around 100 keV, using various techniques like stochastic cooling (pictured below, in the ELENA ring). This gentler energy scale makes it easier for antimatter experiments (ALPHA, GBAR, and others) to capture and study antiprotons without immediate annihilation on surrounding materials.

Positron which are antielectron happens separately and come from radioactive isotopes that undergo β⁺ decay, or they use small-scale electron linear accelerators impinging on a “high-Z” (made of many Z bosons) target to generate pairs of electrons and positrons. The positrons can then be slowed and accumulated in special Penning traps or buffer-gas traps, forming a stable reservoir for later combination with antiprotons to produce antihydrogen.

Below is a view of half of the Antiproton Decelerator hall, that is using antiprotons slowed down by the ELENA facility.

Below is the ELENA decelerator:

And the GBAR (Gravitational Behavior of Antimatter at Rest) experiment, which is part of AEgIS that measures the freefall acceleration of antimatter under gravity:

You may wonder whether antimatter can be stored. It can, and only in extremely small quantities. Since antimatter annihilates upon contact with ordinary matter, it must be confined in ultrahigh-vacuum chambers and held away from material walls by electromagnetic fields. The Antihydrogen trap (ATRAP) experiment compares hydrogen atoms with their antimatter equivalents. With the ALPHA experiment, small numbers of antihydrogen atoms have been stored for seconds to minutes using Penning traps for charged antiparticles like positrons and antineutrons (below), combining strong magnetic and electric fields. Penning traps are also used in trapped ions quantum computers! Neutral antihydrogen can be trapped in magnetic bottles traps. The ALPHA experiment has already stored antihydrogen for over 1,000 seconds in a magnetically neutral trap.

More on the antimatter factory:

Web story

At last, of course, you are remembered that the web and HTML were created at CERN by Tim Berneers-Lee in 1989. You got a plaque in a corridor next to his former office. You can’t escape getting goosebumps about it!

As shown in the papers below, the creation of the web at CERN was not a random event coming out of the head of a single isolated researcher. It responded to a clear user need: share information and knowledge among a large community of international researchers scattered in dozens of countries and hundred labs. High-energy physics happens to be a non-commercial domain and a very open field. This required and open and standard architecture, thus HTML. The rest is History.

We could also quickly visit the CERN data center given a new one is under construction.

Indeed, all these experiments generate peta-bytes of data every year that are sifted through to find useful information.

That’s all for this CERN visit!

Writing this long piece was quite an exercise. It’s a “learning expedition” after the “physical expedition”. Indeed, when visiting such a large infrastructure, you capture bits of insights and information, but the constructed mental image remains fuzzy. Researching a bit about it and writing such a post is a self-learning method. Sharing it makes it useful beyond my own ego and intellect!

Thanks for your long attention span!

RRR

 
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
img
img
img

Publié le 27 janvier 2025 et mis à jour le 29 janvier 2025 Post de | Actualités, Quantique | 1070 lectures

PDF Afficher une version imprimable de cet article     

Reçevez par email les alertes de parution de nouveaux articles :


 

RRR

 
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
img
img
img


Ajouter un commentaire

Vous pouvez utiliser ces tags dans vos commentaires :<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong> , sachant qu'une prévisualisation de votre commentaire est disponible en bas de page après le captcha.

Last posts / derniers articles

Free downloads

Understanding Quantum Technologies 2024, a free 1,554 pages ebook about all quantum technologies (computing, telecommunications, cryptography, sensing):

image

Understanding Quantum Technologies 2024 Short version, a 26 pages version with key takeaways from the eponymous book.

image

The Two-Spin Enigma: From the Helium Atom to Quantum Ontology, a quantum foundations paper coauthored with Philippe Grangier, Alexia Auffèves, Nayla Farouki and Mathias Van den Bossche (paper backstory).
image

Voir aussi la liste complète des publications de ce blog.

Derniers commentaires

“Merci Olivier pour un article toujours fouillé et à des années lumières (bon d'accord pas tant que ça) de ce qu'on peut lire sous la plume d'autres auteurs bien moins...”
“Bravo Olivier! Quel boulot tu m’épates totalement et je t’adresse mes plus sincères félicitations! Je ne suis pas sûr de tout lire car je suis maintenant 100% dans l’art et la poésie et mon seul rapport à la...”
“[…] to Olivier Ezratty, author of Understanding quantum technologies 2023, the challenge for Europe is to position itself outside of where the US and China are likely end up...”
“Désolé, je suis passé à l'anglais en 2021 sans revenir au français. Traduire un tel ouvrage (1366) pages d'une langue à l'autre est un travail herculéen, même avec des outils de traduction automatique. Sachant...”
“Je suis un artiste conceptuel, certes je garde la grande majorité de mon travail dans ma tête par défaut d'un grand mécène. Mon travail de base se situe sur le "mimétisme" qui mène aux itérations et de nombreux...”

Abonnement email

Pour recevoir par email les alertes de parution de nouveaux articles :


 

RRR

 
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
img
img
img

Derniers albums photos

Depuis juillet 2014, mes photos sont maintenant intégrées dans ce site sous la forme d'albums consultables dans le plugin "Photo-Folders". Voici les derniers albums publiés ou mis à jour. Cliquez sur les vignettes pour accéder aux albums.
albth
QFDN
Expo
791 photos
albth
Remise Légion d'Honneur Philippe Herbert Jul2021
2021
15 photos
albth
Vivatech Jun2021
2021
120 photos
albth
Visite C2N Palaiseau Mar2021
2021
17 photos
albth
Annonce Stratégie Quantique C2N Jan2021
2021
137 photos
albth
Maison Bergès Jul2020
2020
54 photos
albth
Grenoble Jul2020
2020
22 photos

image

Avec Marie-Anne Magnac, j'ai lancé #QFDN, l'initiative de valorisation de femmes du numérique par la photo. Elle circule dans différentes manifestations. J'ai réalisé entre 2011 et mi 2023 plus de 800 portraits photographiques de femmes du numérique avec une représentation de tous les métiers du numérique.

Les photos et les bios de ces femmes du numérique sont présentées au complet sur le site QFDN ! Vous pouvez aussi visualiser les derniers portraits publiés sur mon propre site photo. Et ci-dessous, les 16 derniers par date de prise de vue, les vignettes étant cliquables.
flow
Gaëlle Rannou
Gaëlle est étudiante à 42 Paris et tutrice de l’équipe pédagogique (en 2021).
flow
Jehanne Dussert
Jehanne est étudiante à l'école 42, membre d'AI For Tomorrow et d'Open Law, le Droit ouvert. Elle est aussi fondatrice de "Comprendre l'endométriose", un chatbot informant sur cette maladie qui touche une personne menstruée sur 10, disponible sur Messenger. #entrepreneuse #juridique #santé
flow
Chloé Hermary
Chloé est fondatrice d'Ada Tech School, une école d'informatique alternative et inclusive dont la mission est de former une nouvelle génération de talents diversifié à avoir un impact sur le monde. #entrepreneuse #formation
flow
Anna Minguzzi
Anna est Directrice de Recherche au CNRS au Laboratoire de Physique et Modélisation des Milieux Condensés (LPMMC) à Grenoble. #quantique
flow
Maeliza Seymour
Maeliza est CEO et co-fondatrice de CodistAI, qui permet de créer une documentation du code informatique par une IA.
flow
Candice Thomas
Candice est ingénieure-chercheuse au CEA-Leti, travaillant sur l’intégration 3D de bits quantiques au sein du projet Quantum Silicon Grenoble. #recherche #quantique
flow
Stéphanie Robinet
Stéphanie dirige un laboratoire de conception intégrée de circuits électroniques du CEA-Leti qui travaille sur des systèmes sur puces intégrés, des interfaces de capteurs, des interfaces de contrôle de qubits et de la gestion intégrée de l'énergie. #recherche #quantique
flow
Sabine Keravel
Sabine est responsable du business development pour l’informatique quantique chez Atos. #quantique #IT
flow
Céline Castadot
Céline est HPC, AI and Quantum strategic project manager chez Atos.
flow
Léa Bresque
Léa est doctorante, en thèse à l'institut Néel du CNRS en thermodynamique quantique, sous la direction d'Alexia Auffèves (en 2021). #quantique #recherche
flow
Emeline Parizel
Emeline est chef de projet web et facilitatrice graphique chez Klee Group, co-fondatrice TEDxMontrouge, gribouilleuse à ses heures perdues, joue dans une troupe de comédie musicale, co-animatrice de meetups et est sensible à l’art et à la culture. #création
flow
Elvira Shishenina
Elvira est Quantum Computing lead chez BMW ainsi que présidente de QuantX, l'association des polytechniciens du quantique. #quantique
flow
Marie-Noëlle Semeria
Marie-Noëlle est Chief Technology Officer pour le Groupe Total après avoir dirigé le CEA-Leti à Grenoble. #recherche
flow
Gwendolyn Garan
Gwendolyn est travailleuse indépendante, Game UX Designer, Game UX Researcher (GUR) et 2D Artist pour le jeu vidéo, étudiante en Master 2 Sciences du Jeu, speaker et Formatrice sur l'autisme et la neurodiversité, l'accessibilité et les systèmes de représentation dans les jeux vidéo. #création #jeuvidéo
flow
Alexandra Ferreol
Alexandra est étudiante d'un bachelor Game Design à L'Institut Supérieur des Arts Appliqués (année scolaire 2019/2020) #création #jeuvidéo
flow
Ann-elfig Turpin
Ann-elfig est étudiante en deuxième année à Lisaa Paris Jeux Vidéos (Technical artist, 3D artiste), année scolaire 2019/2020. #création #jeuvidéo